Animal rights and academic freedom
Debating current industrial farming
I advocate for animal rights — mostly for pigs in pork production — because someone needs to speak for the millions of pigs around here from a position disentangled from financial incentives. It’s not that I planned my life this way. In fact, I wish I had never seen the tight, wretched cages in which pigs are kept for life in this province and country. I wish, eight years ago, that I had just gotten up from the factory-farm meeting at the Humane Society and said: “This is just a bad dream. I’m going home to wake up now.”
I advocate for animal rights from a very pragmatic philosophical position. I simply want animals out of cages, granted the ability to move around and check things out. We all die; we should all get to lie in the sun and explore the shade sometimes.
The Manitoba Pork Council, which helps fund the faculty of agriculture’s research centres, is a proponent of industrial pork production and heavy pork exports. In my opinion, the faculty of agriculture’s department of animal science is too bound up with the pork industry. As part of an institution of critical thinking, they should hold industry at an arm’s length and work independently from it, even if only occasionally. Instead, Manitoba Pork Council and Faculty of Agriculture work closely together. See Manitobapork.com for information about their exports and contributions to the U of M. It's all there.
However, it’s not like my objections can bring down the faculty of agriculture and international business. Moreover, I come at everything from a commitment to democratic process and in the name of a simple goal: moving sows from their caged existence and into group housing.
I also know and co-write with a Canadian independent barn and slaughterhouse investigator, Twyla Francois. She sees horrible things on a daily basis and I work with her to make some kind of sense of them. We both support local production rather than international markets and we want the government to help push things in a better direction. Until that happens, pork produced in intensive confinement systems should be completely boycotted and bailout money should be directed toward improved conditions.
Have steps been taken to silence us? Yes: people have gone out of their ways to try to shut us up. We have both been frightened — and we have both been forced to seek legal council several times.
Keep a sharp eye on the power of corporations to bring the curtain down on academic freedom and on the consumer’s rights to full disclosure of production methods. Intellectual inquiry requires protection from individuals and companies with the power to cut it down in the name of money or out of misunderstanding. If we don’t stay on top of these issues, we are all going to wake up one day to something worse than the H1N1 pandemic, listeria outbreaks and a lake full of phosphorus — and we’ll be faced with faculties full of academics too afraid for their jobs to ask what the heck is going on.
If you disagree with what I’ve written here, come out to the panel discussion being scheduled for March 25 in the Engineering Building at 11 a.m.. It will feature Dr. Kees Scheepens from the Netherlands, a pig veterinarian and author of several books on raising pigs according to advanced humane methods. He and Vicki Burns, former director of the Winnipeg Humane Society, are going to address the cruelty of intensive-confinement systems, the fact that their phase-out must get underway, and the impact of pork production on fragile ecosystems.
Dana Medoro is an associate professor of American literature and culture.
New Comment
The Manitoban reserves the right to edit or remove any comment that:
- is libelous, threatening, obscene or constitutes hate speech
- directly and deliberately insults other posters
- is promotional or commercial in nature
Furthermore, the Manitoban reserves the right to reproduce comments in the print edition of the newspaper.
Discussion
Dana's piece is bold and tackles an issue that we as a society avoid at our peril: the creeping nature of private money on universities and all levels of education, government, and all other institutions once considered public. Public means jointly held, part of the commons, shared interest.
The role of governments is to establish shared interests. Rarely do they establish this. Usually they represent special interests and spend most of their time and resources on P.R. trying to give us the message we want what they are doing to happen. They thus play on our inability as a society to fully self-organize, which is naturally a question of scale and geography: we're too large. A 50 person eco-village, ok, they can cope. But a place as large as Manitoba with over one million people: ungovernable.
At least by current methods of alleged representation. Our electoral system is so outdated, still using one designed for two not multiple parties, with false majorities and a government run by a party whose strongest election platform in the next campaign will be comprised of benefiting from a lousy election system: vote for us or those less desirable louts across the aisle will get in, rather than on ideas that progress the common interests of our society.
To ascertain these common interests, more direct democracy needs to be practiced and more space opened up for public forums and debates, not the horse and pony show that passes for consultations on such things as Bi-poles, Waverley West, hog barn developments.
Regarding the specific point of hog barns, I encourage anyone to listen to or read Kate Storey's presentation to the Clean Environment Commission with regards to raising pigs free range and the better economics of open-pen models, with far fewer antibiotic and hormonal inputs required.
This should be a no-brainer, and effectively counters the red herring populist reactionary response to the advocates of banning sow crates that "farmers feed families." Of course they do, nobody contests that, and to frame the question as such is to be intransigent and unwilling to consider a way that is not only healthier and more humane, but actually is more economic and produces better meat, for this as yet unable to make the switch for whatever similar reasons of intransigence, to a far more sustainable vegetable-based diet.
Thank you for the article and keep up the excellent work you're doing on behalf of the pigs.