Volume 94 Issue 26
The Official University of Manitoba Students' Newspaper Website
March 28, 2007
Small FontMedium FontLarge Font  Font Size
Respond  Respond to Story   Email  Email Article   Print-Friendly  Printer-Friendly Version

Gimme shelter

The housing crisis in aboriginal communities

ANDREW LODGE STAFF

ILLUSTRATION BY DIRK BLOUW
The houses, strewn randomly in an area of several square kilometres, are each the size of a suburban garage. Most are tattered and weather-beaten; very few have glass windows . . . More than one-third [of residents] are essentially homeless — sharing the overcrowded homes of friends or relatives, or living in shacks or decaying houses.”

So writes award-winning Globe and Mail journalist Geoffrey York in his landmark book The Dispossessed: Life and Death in Native Canada. York was writing about the remote Cree town of Shamattawa in northeastern Manitoba, but he could have been describing any number of aboriginal communities across the province and throughout much of rural Canada.

The housing situation in aboriginal communities has been in crisis for a long time now, but improvements have been slow in coming. Dozens of studies — some, like the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples in 1996 and the Auditor General’s Report in 2003, issued from the highest levels — have pointed to the problem, yet action with positive consequences has remained elusive.

In the northern community I recently visited, the concerns regarding housing are typical of other aboriginal towns in the province. Contaminated drinking water, dilapidated structures, poorly heated and improperly sealed houses, and persistent mould are some of the more common complaints. This is all compounded, it seems, by the sheer statistical incompatibility of, on the one hand, available housing, and on the other, a rapidly growing population. “Every year there are more of us,” says one resident I spoke with last week, “and every year they build a few more houses, but they are always behind and they never catch up.”

The situation is unlikely to improve in the near future, according to National Aboriginal Housing Association President David Seymour. “I am extremely dismayed that there was no reference to new money to help address the poor housing conditions endured by the aboriginal peoples across Canada in today’s federal budget,” said Seymour in a written statement in reaction to last week’s budget release by the ruling Conservatives.

Overcrowding

One only needs to visit a few houses in aboriginal Manitoba to get a sense of the housing crisis and the overriding issue of overcrowding. In many houses, every room is used to sleep in, whether it’s a bedroom or not, and often several people must share one space. With little or no room for storage and with so many occupants, the houses are easily cramped.

The overcrowded conditions are reflected in housing density figures. According to a study published in the International Journal of Epidemiology, the number of people per room in a given living space among the aboriginal population in Canada is double that of the national average. This means, according to the National Aboriginal Health Association, that one in four aboriginal people in this country live in conditions considered by demographers to be “crowded.” Not surprisingly, this has been shown to be directly linked to several health and social issues. In Nunavut, for instance, where the housing shortage is most severe, lower respiratory tract infections among infants, infections that can be life-threatening, are reported to be second highest in the world. Some researchers have also argued that violence, in the form of suicide and partner abuse, is more likely under these crowded conditions. In Nunavut, the incidence of such social ills is astronomically higher than the national averages.

And the problem will likely only get worse, if current trends are any indication. Aboriginal people represent Canada’s fastest-growing population, and, in all, over half the population is under the age of 25. Studies on population patterns indicate that there is little to no evidence of a growth rate decline in the near future.

No one is exactly sure of how many houses are needed. In 2001, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada estimated that 8,500 houses were needed on reserves across the country. This figure does not include off-reserve housing needs, which are also substantial. Nor does it include the northern territories. A study conducted in Nunavut by the University of British Columbia estimates that, in that territory alone, with its comparatively small population (only 30,000 people in 2006), $2 billion will be required over the next 10 years to bring the housing situation up to snuff.

Broken houses

As if the housing shortage was not problem enough, the existing structures in many communities are in appalling shape. In 2003, the Auditor General of Canada reported that almost half of current aboriginal residences required renovations of some sort. In the same report, researchers noted that many homes currently being built failed to meet national standards. Both issues are compounded by the difficulty in accessing many of the northern communities for substantial portions of the year.

Houses with holes in the walls, with only plastic or plywood over windows, with furnaces that don’t work, or without adequate insulation to begin with, do not do much to protect their inhabitants in the cold winter months. And since many communities are located in the north, the winters are colder and longer than even most Winnipeggers can fathom. When supplies become scarce, many residents say that they simply end up doing without.

Central to the notion of housing quality is potable water, which remains an issue of primary importance in many communities. Two years ago, the topic of water quality on First Nations reserves was thrust into the national spotlight when the community of

According to Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, if First Nations were ranked by the United Nations Human Development Index country-by-country ranking system, they would place 63rd.

Kashechewan on James Bay in northern Ontario was evacuated after the water was found to be contaminated by E. coli, the same bug responsible for the deaths in Walkerton. At the time, the Globe and Mail reported that some 60 per cent of residents had become ill.

Kashechewan was a glimpse into the conditions in many First Nations homes around the country. At the time, the entire community had been under a boil-water advisory for two years. But the town was not alone. During the evacuation, Assembly of First Nations Chief Phil Fontaine argued that over 100 aboriginal communities were on permanent drinking-water advisories. Two years later, in March of this year, Health Canada reports that there are still 88 communities on such alerts.

Third World conditions

Back in the late ’80s, Chief Louis Stevenson of the Peguis Band here in Manitoba embarrassed the federal government by inviting the visiting South African ambassador to see conditions for himself on the Peguis reserve. At the time, the Mulroney government was publicly applying pressure on South Africa to end its policy of apartheid and the consequently abhorrent circumstances under which many black people lived in that country. Stevenson wanted to draw parallels between the infamous Bantustans in South Africa and the pitiful conditions on reserves in much of Canada.

Stevenson’s point was not lost on native leaders. The resemblance of their communities to the conditions commonly associated with poorer countries is at times shocking, especially considering Canada’s material wealth and its claim to be one of the most desirable nations in the world in which to live. The Assembly of First Nations, the foremost aboriginal political body in this country, calls conditions on reserves akin to those in the Third World. According to Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, if First Nations were ranked by the United Nations Human Development Index country-by-country ranking system, they would place 63rd, meaning that aboriginals in Canada live in conditions found in the “developing” or “Third” world.

It is the congruity between the material conditions on First Nations and the Third World which is so disturbing. Tattered houses and smashed-out windows are a common sight on many reserves. For the outsider, the scene is one that is very hard to believe, and even harder to justify. Fortunately for mainstream Canadians, except for the odd gut-wrenching media exposé, most reserves are nicely tucked away and so remain invisible, effectively out of sight and out of mind.

But the material conditions alone do not in and of themselves form the entire picture. The ragged buildings mirror the torn fabric that forms the fibres of these communities. For so many of the broke-down houses, there seem to be broken homes on the inside. Like the housing conditions, the figures on societal dysfunction are not unknown, nor are they hard to find. Poverty, unemployment, suicide rates, domestic violence statistics, educational levels — the list goes on and on — are embodied in the physical structures in which people live.

Some Canadians are sometimes quick to criticize aboriginal people as “having it easy,” because of the perception that being aboriginal means that everything is given to you free of charge. But those who venture out to “Indian country” are often shocked at what they find. As an aboriginal student here at the University of Manitoba told me recently, “People always talk about the free ride I get because I’m native, of all the handouts and stuff. They should come visit my hometown, see how we live. Then they’ll see what kind of free ride I get.